Evil (2019)
Crime
Kristen Bouchard, psychologue clinicienne sceptique, se joint à un prêtre en formation et à un entrepreneur en cols blanc pour enquêter sur des miracles supposés, des possessions démoniaques et d’autres événements extraordinaires. Ils doivent déterminer s’il existe une explication scientifique ou si quelque chose de vraiment surnaturel est à l’œuvre...
▶ Watch TrailerWatch Trailer
Overview
Kristen Bouchard, psychologue clinicienne sceptique, se joint à un prêtre en formation et à un entrepreneur en cols blanc pour enquêter sur des miracles supposés, des possessions démoniaques et d’autres événements extraordinaires. Ils doivent déterminer s’il existe une explication scientifique ou si quelque chose de vraiment surnaturel est à l’œuvre...
Cast
- Katja Herbers as Dr Kristen Bouchard
- Mike Colter as David Acosta
- Aasif Mandvi as Ben Shakir
- Michael Emerson as Dr Leland Townsend
- Brooklyn Shuck as Lynn Bouchard
- Skylar Gray as Lila Bouchard
- Maddy Crocco as Lexis Bouchard
- Dalya Knapp as Laura Bouchard
- Andrea Martin as Sister Andrea
- Kurt Fuller as Dr. Kurt Boggs
Similar Shows
Reviews
2022-08-15
What a strange little show. That's my first and really only reaction to Evil.
I don't know what to make of it or even, how to adequately, define it. I suspect that's the idea. It walks a blurred line between religion/superstition and atheism/rationalism.
At first, I found it a rather dissonance inducing experience but as I became accustomed to its quirks, of which there are many, I found I rather liked it.
As a long standing rationalist, its religiosity amused me but, thankfully, the manner in which it is presented, is not lecturing or heavy handed. Rather, you get opposing views and perspectives, on the often strange world, in which we live. Indeed, what it demonstrates is the same world can be a very different place, depending on who you are and what you choose to believe.
Acting is decent if not exceptional and the episodic story lines are mostly but not always, intriguing.
I don't know what to make of it or even, how to adequately, define it. I suspect that's the idea. It walks a blurred line between religion/superstition and atheism/rationalism.
At first, I found it a rather dissonance inducing experience but as I became accustomed to its quirks, of which there are many, I found I rather liked it.
As a long standing rationalist, its religiosity amused me but, thankfully, the manner in which it is presented, is not lecturing or heavy handed. Rather, you get opposing views and perspectives, on the often strange world, in which we live. Indeed, what it demonstrates is the same world can be a very different place, depending on who you are and what you choose to believe.
Acting is decent if not exceptional and the episodic story lines are mostly but not always, intriguing.
2024-07-13
Racist and ignorant. Welcome to the 2020s, baby!